Rants in Ron Paul newsletters
December 13th, 2008 posted by
admin
southsidetokyo asked:
The GOP White House hopeful distances himself from remarks in past literature bearing his name.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Email newsletter related posts:
sportsstar69 says:
December 13th, 2008 at 3:39 pm
This clown didn’t know who was working for him ? ROFL
BraaapMan2000 says:
December 17th, 2008 at 3:21 am
Ron Paul says he didn’t write these, but the publications put forth the info in a manner that suggests it Paul’s opinion, and their publication spans years. Didn’t RP read his own newsletters? Recently RP suggested that the civil war was unnecessary, and suggested the North could have bought all the slaves and then freed them. The whole point of the civil war is that black people aren’t property.
antoinehjl says:
December 20th, 2008 at 9:02 am
I CAN’T BELIEVE I SUPPORTED THAT ****** PEACE OF ****!HE IS NO BETTER THEN THE OTHER REPUBLICANS! i really thought he could be a good person but like everything you cant believe what you see **** RON PAUL GODDAM FACIST!
StuipedandUgly says:
December 21st, 2008 at 1:19 am
This is garbage of course the media wants to make him look bad. Pff McCain is a ****** basted, some of the debates he makes ****** jokes you don’t see the media saying anything about that. Please don’t be fooled by the idiot box, the most greedy corrupt people run it.
rane305 says:
December 21st, 2008 at 8:35 pm
Damn Ron, I’ve been supporting you the whole way. You truly need to reach out to many of your non-white supporters such as myself and let us know whether this is true or false. Just be real. You’ve always seemed to be real anyway.
kimlee1968 says:
December 22nd, 2008 at 4:55 am
sooo…..the New Republic allowed Stephan Glass to write lies without properly vetting the material. maybe they should stop publishing because the weren’t paying attention!
bwilson32 says:
December 24th, 2008 at 12:20 am
Owners of newsletters don’t always read every article in every issue…especially the longer the newsletter has run. When readers brought it to his attention way back when, Paul apologized that he hadn’t paid closer attention. Apparently, NOBODY knows who wrote those articles, or SOMEBODY would step forward to expose him/her. I believe Paul when he says he doesn’t know. Maybe it was his son…he was a kid then?
bwilson32 says:
December 25th, 2008 at 1:52 am
Google searches for Ron Paul have doubled. Hits to his website and oter Ron Paul sites have increased two-fold. Donations are pouring in. There’s going to be a recount in New Hampshire.
bobbyusbombs says:
December 25th, 2008 at 4:55 pm
this will be blowback all right…on Paul!
bobbyusbombs says:
December 25th, 2008 at 5:31 pm
maybe…he wrote it himself!!
bobbyusbombs says:
December 26th, 2008 at 5:21 pm
I’ve got it! There is no doubt in my military mind: Ron Paul can’t disclose the guy ‘s identity who really wrote the newsletters, ‘cuz they were under heavy enemy fire in ‘Nam see and they did the bayonet slice on the palm blood brothers vow so even though it means the Presidency he can’t betray his friend because he’s so moral and loyal, see…
ZeroCorpse says:
December 29th, 2008 at 4:40 pm
If they catch him raping a Girl Scout:
A: “I have no idea how this happened. I would never **** a Girl Scout. I woke up and here I was, on top of her! Someone must have put me there, when I was asleep.”
(Ron Paul followers nod their heads in agreement)
Q: So are you going to find out who framed you, then?
A: “No, it’s not important. Just know that it wasn’t me.”
(Ron Paul followers nod in agreement. Make more banners.)
bwilson32 says:
December 30th, 2008 at 9:57 pm
If Ron Paul is not “considered a frontruneer” and has “no chance to win” what the hell is the media attacking him like a frontrunner for?
Any free publicity is good publicity. This will backfire on them. It’s obvious when looking at Paul’s record that he is not a ******.
Obama’s church won’t accept white members. Who cares?
lokimagic says:
January 2nd, 2009 at 10:06 am
i heard about this months ago. although it may not be true it is strange that he had an editor on staff that allowed such things to go to print in a newsletter bearing his name. someone knows exactly who wrote these things and paul would look much better if he could say who’s responsible instead of just saying “what’s the point.” the point is you should want to clear your name.